Art criticism and the pleasure principle

Disclaimer: its a summery and it's not be necessary the what I think about art!

summery of:

Walter peter are a very honest criticism, and they talk about the Pleasure of art, and why the criticisms are trying to bring the understanding of what pleasures and why gives to us art, like was alcohol or tobacco, this are for some lovers of art something bad, be cause they are always trying given some deepest value for art, " its use to society, its ennobling purposes."
 So we need prepare for open our mind and understanding the value of pleasure of  the art, and like food the critics are looking for the toasty for the old masters are becomes like wine, and we write about art it's be cause makes us pleasure, even we think with modern art, we have get ripped of " social purpose and serious meaning." we can find ecliptic styles and various ways like Damien Hirst, Cy Twombly, Lucian Freud, Jeff Koons, "these are pleasures, not duties."
art thats feels like duties are "bad" art like in time something equals we can similarty wiht the new "theory-heavy video installations" are very close to the pompous and  moralising Victorian art.


Posted by

Jonathan Jones

Wednesday 11 January 2012 15.34 GMT 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/jan/11/art-criticism-pleasure-principle